📚 Submissions to mark
🔍 Rubric assessment
Thesis Clear, arguable position stated up front 📄 ¶2
Theory Applies Tuckman's stages accurately to the case 📄 ¶1, ¶3
Evidence 7 scholarly sources; 2 are >10 years old 📚 ref list
Analysis Contrasts Tuckman with Belbin — genuine synthesis 📄 ¶3
Critique Describes more than it evaluates in places 📄 ¶4–5
Application Recommendations tied to the case evidence 📄 ¶6
Structure Logical flow; weak transition §4→§5 📄 ¶5
Referencing APA 7th; 3 in-text citation errors 📚 ref list
Expression Clear academic register; minor comma splices 📄 throughout
Word count 1,940 / 2,000 — within range 📄 document
0%
Rubric-match confidence
📝 Draft grade
Argument & analysis 24 / 30
Application of theory 16 / 20
Critical evaluation 11 / 20
Structure & expression 12 / 15
Referencing (APA 7) 13 / 15
Final mark 76 / 100
Grade band: Distinction (70–79)
Drafted in 38 seconds · manual avg ~22 min
⚠️ Text-match 14% — 2 passages echo a 2019 journal article. Check originality before release.