Case Study · Higher Education & Research
From ‘Generation Tool’ to Colleague
RMIT School of Psychology | AI Training | March 2026
At a Glance
| Client | RMIT University — School of Psychology (31 academics) |
| Engagement | 8 weeks — 5 February to 26 March 2026 |
| Format | 8 × 4-hour hands-on workshops (28 contact hours; ~180 person-hours delivered) |
| Investment | $12,800 |
| Core adopters | 3–5 researchers, 5+ sessions each |
| Legacy | 200+ pages of reusable research briefs, handouts, decks & transcripts |
“I used to use AI to just generate stuff or search for stuff. But now I see it as almost like another colleague where you can bounce ideas off and evaluate and error-check. That’s been the biggest enlightenment for me — I never thought before these workshops of using it that way.”
— Russell Conduit, Associate Dean (Psychology), attended 7 of 8 workshopsThe Engagement
The Challenge
- No domain-specific training — university AI sessions covered prompting basics, not psychology research methods
- No verification culture — researchers either trusted AI blindly or avoided it entirely
- No methodology integration — AI used as a search engine, not embedded in research workflows
- 31 academics with scattered, inconsistent AI relationships across the school
What We Built
- 8 workshops covering the full arc from mindset shift to reproducible pipelines
- 11 research briefs synthesising 50,000+ words of peer-reviewed evidence
- 8 slide decks, 8 exercise handouts, 7 clean transcripts and prompt template packs
- A unified ResearchOps Loop: Ingest → Structure → Transform → Verify → Ship
The Impact
- 8 months to 20 minutes — data-extraction code that took 8 months now runs in 20 min
- 500-paper screen with zero errors across 200 spot-checked papers
- Teaching multiplier — core adopters now training their own students
- Conservative Year 1 ROI of 195%+ against the RMAI fee
The Bigger Picture
Most AI training teaches people which buttons to press. The shift that matters — the one Russell named — is moving from treating AI as a generation tool to treating it as a colleague you can reason with, challenge, and error-check.
That shift doesn’t come from a tool demo. It comes from working through your own real tasks, with someone who knows both the technology and the limits of trusting it. For a research school, the payoff compounds: the people we trained are now training their students, and the materials outlast the engagement.
Training a research team or faculty?
If your people are stuck using AI as a search engine — or avoiding it because they don’t trust it — we run domain-specific, methodology-first training that changes how they work. One conversation is all it takes to scope it.
Let’s Have a Conversation or call 0480 032 916Case study published with client approval. Full documentation and evidence available on request.